{
 "generated_note": "Hand-curated. Every row verified against primary sources. See research/deadline-findings.md.",
 "obligations": [
  {
   "id": "ch124-shelter-equity-analysis",
   "title": "Shelter Equity Analysis",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "For each Neighborhood: the number of unsheltered persons, that Neighborhood's share of the City's unsheltered persons, the total shelter and transitional housing beds located there, and its share of citywide beds.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Admin Code Sec. 124.2(a)",
    "ordinance": "Ordinance 172-25 (Board File 250487)",
    "quote": "Within 15 days of the Operative Date, HSH and the Planning Department shall prepare a Shelter Equity Analysis based on data from the 2024 PIT Count.",
    "ordinance_url": "https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/o0172-25.pdf",
    "code_url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin/0-0-0-72544"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing",
    "Planning Department"
   ],
   "due": "2026-01-16",
   "due_basis": "15 days after the Operative Date of 2026-01-01",
   "due_certainty": "firm",
   "cadence": "biennial, refreshed within 60 days of each Point-in-Time Count release",
   "status": "filed",
   "discoverability": "buried",
   "why_it_matters": "HSH filed this. The Board agenda gives a receipt window rather than a date, and the deadline falls inside that window, so we do not know whether it was early or late and do not claim either. What is certain is that it is invisible. It has no page on sf.gov, no catalogue record, and no entry on HSH's own reporting and compliance page. It exists as one line in the Petitions and Communications section of a Board agenda. Both Chapter 124 deliverables behave this way. The Fair Share Rule in 124.2(b) still has no public input, because a document nobody can locate cannot be used to check a siting decision.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Board of Supervisors agenda for 2026-01-27, Petitions and Communications, read directly",
     "url": "https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/sites/default/files/bag012726_agenda.pdf",
     "result": "FOUND. 'From the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (HSH), pursuant to Ordinance No. 172-25, submitting a January 2026 Shelter Equity Analysis. File No. 250487.' The agenda's receipt window is 2026-01-08 through 2026-01-22, which brackets the 2026-01-16 deadline.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:05Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "sf.gov content catalogue, enumerated in full",
     "url": "https://api.sf.gov/api/v2/documents/?order=-id&limit=1000",
     "result": "absent from all 59,565 documents and all 5,567 report pages. The filing exists but was never published to sf.gov.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:05Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "HSH Additional Reporting and Compliance collection, where HSH lists its filings against their mandating authority",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/resource--2024--additional-reporting-and-compliance",
     "result": "no Chapter 124 entry, despite HSH having filed",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:05Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [
    {
     "title": "Home by the Bay: Equity Addendum, Equity Analysis Executive Summary",
     "url": "https://media.api.sf.gov/documents/Equity_Analysis_-_Executive_Summary.pdf",
     "why_not": "A racial and demographic disparity analysis of homelessness system outcomes across nine metrics. Chapter 124 requires a geographic analysis by Neighborhood. It was also created 2025-11-20, before the 2026-01-01 operative date, so it cannot discharge a duty that had not yet attached."
    },
    {
     "title": "Shelter Monitoring Committee emergency report, March 2026",
     "url": "https://api.sf.gov/documents/60248/Equity_Report_-_March_2026.pdf",
     "why_not": "Authored by the Shelter Monitoring Committee, not by HSH and the Planning Department as the section requires, and it contains no per-Neighborhood bed or unsheltered table. Notable in its own right: it warned of unaddressed inequities and data gaps, and the Committee was abolished by Ordinance 99-26 three months later."
    },
    {
     "title": "Controller's Assessment of the San Francisco Shelter System, December 2024",
     "url": "https://media.api.sf.gov/documents/CON_Shelter_Assessment_Report.pdf",
     "why_not": "Contains a section headed Shelter System Demographics and Equity Analysis at page 30, but it is a Controller product from before the ordinance, not the HSH and Planning deliverable, and it has no Neighborhood share table."
    }
   ],
   "open_lead": "KQED reported on 2025-11-11 that a Budget and Legislative Analyst analysis showed neighborhood-level service versus need discrepancies using the figures this section calls for. If that product is public, the City had the analysis before the deadline.",
   "watch_terms": [
    "shelter equity",
    "equitable distribution"
   ],
   "we_built_instead": {
    "label": "We built as much of it as public data allows",
    "href": "/evidence.html"
   },
   "requests": [],
   "filed_on": "2026-01-22",
   "correction": {
    "date": "2026-08-25",
    "text": "This row read MISSING and said no Shelter Equity Analysis had been published anywhere, at 221 days overdue. That was false, and it was this site's headline claim against two named departments. HSH submitted the analysis to the Board of Supervisors in January 2026, within the receipt window that brackets the deadline. Board of Supervisors agendas are published as PDFs at a predictable path and every departmental filing is listed in their Petitions and Communications section. That venue was not checked when this row was first published, which is why the row was wrong. The row now reads filed and buried, which is what the evidence actually supports."
   },
   "filed_window": {
    "from": "2026-01-08",
    "to": "2026-01-22",
    "note": "The Board agenda records only the window in which the Clerk received a filing, not the date. The deadline of 2026-01-16 falls inside it, so whether this arrived early or late cannot be determined from the public record."
   }
  },
  {
   "id": "street-teams-report",
   "title": "Street Teams annual report",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "Report to the Board on the efficiency and effectiveness of the City's street teams: goals, metrics, milestones, team structure and staffing, shelter types offered and rejection rates by type, capacity constraints, data-sharing obstructions, and response to the 2023 Budget and Legislative Analyst audit.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Admin Code Sec. 20.11-2",
    "ordinance": "Ordinance 251-24 (Board File 240805), effective 2024-12-08",
    "quote": "Starting in 2025, reports shall be due annually on the last Friday of September.",
    "code_url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin/0-0-0-57760"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Department of Emergency Management",
    "HSH",
    "DPH",
    "Fire Department"
   ],
   "due": "2025-09-26",
   "due_basis": "The last Friday of September 2025 under Sec. 20.11-2(c). Contested: DEM asked the Board for an extension before the deadline, and we cannot establish whether it was granted.",
   "due_certainty": "contested",
   "cadence": "annual",
   "status": "missing",
   "discoverability": "absent",
   "why_it_matters": "No report has been located, and Sec. 20.11-2(e) separately requires DEM to post each report on its own website within 10 days. But DEM asked the Board for an extension before the deadline passed, so the deadline itself is contested and this row should not be read as a clean failure.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Department of Emergency Management website, full document listing",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/departments--department-emergency-management",
     "result": "exactly one PDF on the entire site, a 2021 security camera policy",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:05Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "sf.gov CMS enumeration and search for street teams reporting",
     "url": "https://api.sf.gov/api/v2/documents/?search=street+teams",
     "result": "no report responsive to Sec. 20.11-2",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:05Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Health Commission document set, searched for any Street Teams filing that might satisfy the section",
     "url": "https://api.sf.gov/api/v2/documents/?search=street+teams",
     "result": "one DPH presentation from 2026-07-06 about a contract transfer, listed as considered and rejected below",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:06Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Board of Supervisors agenda for 2025-09-02, Petitions and Communications",
     "url": "https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/sites/default/files/bag090225_agenda.pdf",
     "result": "'From the Department of Emergency Management (DEM), pursuant to Administrative Code, Chapter 20, submitting request for extension for annual Street Teams Report.' Received in the 2025-07-24 to 2025-08-28 window, before the 2025-09-26 deadline. Whether the Board granted it is not established.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:06Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [
    {
     "title": "Street Response Teams report, FY23-24, published October 2024",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/departments--department-emergency-management",
     "why_not": "A voluntary predecessor published before Ordinance 251-24 took effect on 2024-12-08. It cannot satisfy a duty that did not yet exist, and no equivalent was published in the 2025 cycle."
    },
    {
     "title": "DPH Street Teams Presentation, Health Commission, 2026-07-06",
     "url": "https://api.sf.gov/documents/60220/Street_Team_Presentation_Health_Commission_Finance_and_Planning_Meetin_x0qeLDV.cleaned.pdf",
     "why_not": "A DPH slide deck to the Health Commission Finance and Planning Committee about a Street Teams contract transfer and the July 1 2026 relaunch. Sec. 20.11-2 requires a written report to the Board of Supervisors covering goals, metrics, milestones, team structure and staffing, shelter types offered with rejection rates by type, capacity constraints, data-sharing obstructions, and a response to the 2023 Budget and Legislative Analyst audit. This deck addresses none of those and went to a different body. It is listed because it is the nearest thing that exists and would otherwise be the first rebuttal offered."
    }
   ],
   "watch_terms": [
    "street team",
    "street response team"
   ],
   "requests": [],
   "request": {
    "targets": [
     {
      "agency": "Department of Emergency Management",
      "portal": "https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com"
     }
    ],
    "subject": "Immediate Disclosure Request: Street Teams report, Admin Code 20.11-2",
    "draft": "IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST\n\n1. I request the Street Teams report required by San Francisco Administrative Code section 20.11-2, due on the last Friday of September 2025, together with any draft or transmittal correspondence. I also request records sufficient to show whether the report was posted on the Department's website as section 20.11-2(e) requires within 10 calendar days of submission.\n\n2. If you hold no such record, I request, under California Government Code section 7922.600, that you identify where records of this type are maintained, including the technology systems and physical locations involved, and assist in identifying any responsive record under a different title. If your office is willing to provide a written statement of diligent search and failure to find the record, of the kind described in California Evidence Code section 1284, that would be welcome, though I recognise no statute compels one.\n\nThis is a request under the California Public Records Act and San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 67. Because it is marked as an Immediate Disclosure Request under Section 67.25(a), a response is due by the close of business on the next business day. If you claim an extension under Section 67.25(b), please state the specific basis in writing.\n\nPlease produce records on a rolling basis under Section 67.25(d) rather than withholding everything until the last item is ready."
   },
   "search_boundary": "This search covered the sf.gov content catalogue by enumeration, department websites, and the commission agenda archives named above. It did NOT cover documents that exist only inside Legistar agenda packets, which cannot be searched programmatically, and it does not reach systems outside sf.gov unless a specific check below names one. A document filed with the Clerk and never posted would not appear here. That is how the Admin Code 124.4 report escaped an earlier sweep. Board of Supervisors agendas are published as PDFs at a predictable path and every departmental filing is listed in their Petitions and Communications section. That venue was not checked when this row was first published, which is why the row was wrong."
  },
  {
   "id": "rapid-rehousing-report",
   "title": "Rapid Rehousing implementation hearing and report",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "A hearing on implementation of the Rapid Rehousing Programs plus an issued report covering households served, average subsidy, and outcomes.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Admin Code Sec. 20.21-4",
    "ordinance": "Ordinance 289-24 (Board File 241038)",
    "quote": "Report and hearing due by December 1.",
    "code_url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Homelessness Oversight Commission",
    "HSH"
   ],
   "due": "2025-12-01",
   "due_basis": "December 1 deadline set by Sec. 20.21-4",
   "due_certainty": "firm",
   "cadence": "annual",
   "status": "missing",
   "discoverability": "absent",
   "why_it_matters": "This is the one absence claim on the site that has survived a search of the venue that falsified the others. It is also the only duty the Homelessness Oversight Commission owes on a clock: Charter Sec. 4.133, which created the Commission, sets no reporting cadence at all.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Read the agenda of every Homelessness Oversight Commission meeting from January 2025 through September 2026",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/departments--homelessness-oversight-commission",
     "result": "no Rapid Rehousing implementation hearing on any agenda in the span. The August 6 2026 agenda carries three Rapid Re-housing contract approvals, listed under considered and rejected; the September 3 2026 agenda has no Rapid Rehousing item.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:07Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Meeting cancellations checked against the deadline window",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/departments--homelessness-oversight-commission",
     "result": "the Commission cancelled its October 2, November 6, December 4 and January 1 meetings, which spans the December 1 deadline",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:07Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Every Board of Supervisors agenda published between 2025-07-01 and 2026-09-12, 45 in total, searched in full text",
     "url": "https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/sites/default/files/",
     "result": "zero mentions of Rapid Rehousing or Sec. 20.21-4 in any agenda, including the Petitions and Communications sections where departmental filings to the Board are listed",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:07Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [
    {
     "title": "Homelessness Oversight Commission agenda, August 6 2026, items F to H: three Rapid Re-housing contract and grant agreements",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/meeting--august-2026-homelessness-oversight-commission-meeting",
     "why_not": "Procurement approvals for Family and Transitional Age Youth Rapid Re-housing providers (Homeless Prenatal Program, Larkin Street Youth Services, Unity Care Group). Sec. 20.21-4 requires a hearing on implementation and an issued report on households served, average subsidy and outcomes. Approving new contracts is neither, and the September 3 2026 agenda has no Rapid Rehousing item."
    }
   ],
   "watch_terms": [
    "rapid re-?housing"
   ],
   "requests": [],
   "request": {
    "targets": [
     {
      "agency": "HSH",
      "portal": "https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com"
     }
    ],
    "subject": "Immediate Disclosure Request: Rapid Rehousing report, Admin Code 20.21-4",
    "draft": "IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST\n\n1. I request the Rapid Rehousing implementation report required by San Francisco Administrative Code section 20.21-4, due December 1, 2025, covering households served, average subsidy and outcomes, together with any records showing whether the accompanying implementation hearing was scheduled, noticed, held, or cancelled.\n\n2. If you hold no such record, I request, under California Government Code section 7922.600, that you identify where records of this type are maintained, including the technology systems and physical locations involved, and assist in identifying any responsive record under a different title. If your office is willing to provide a written statement of diligent search and failure to find the record, of the kind described in California Evidence Code section 1284, that would be welcome, though I recognise no statute compels one.\n\nThis is a request under the California Public Records Act and San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 67. Because it is marked as an Immediate Disclosure Request under Section 67.25(a), a response is due by the close of business on the next business day. If you claim an extension under Section 67.25(b), please state the specific basis in writing.\n\nPlease produce records on a rolling basis under Section 67.25(d) rather than withholding everything until the last item is ready."
   },
   "search_boundary": "This search covered the sf.gov content catalogue by enumeration, department websites, and the commission agenda archives named above. It did NOT cover documents that exist only inside Legistar agenda packets, which cannot be searched programmatically, and it does not reach systems outside sf.gov unless a specific check below names one. A document filed with the Clerk and never posted would not appear here. That is how the Admin Code 124.4 report escaped an earlier sweep."
  },
  {
   "id": "cgj-at-scale-60day",
   "title": "Civil Grand Jury responses, 60 day (At Scale, At Risk)",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "Written responses to the 2025-26 Civil Grand Jury report on homelessness data and oversight. The Mayor must comment on all five findings and thirteen recommendations; the City Attorney on Finding 4 and Recommendation 4.1. Responses were also requested from the Homelessness Oversight Commission, HSH, the Controller and the Office of Contract Administration.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "Cal. Penal Code Sec. 933(c) and 933.05",
    "ordinance": "SF Civil Grand Jury 2025-2026, At Scale, At Risk, published 2026-06-23",
    "quote": "The elected county officer or agency head shall comment within 60 days to the presiding judge of the superior court.",
    "code_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&sectionNum=933.05",
    "report_url": "https://media.api.sf.gov/documents/2026_CGJ_Rpt_At_Scale_At_Risk_-_Upgrading_Data_and_Oversight_to_Improve_Homele_woZ0ksh.pdf"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Mayor",
    "City Attorney"
   ],
   "due": "2026-08-24",
   "due_basis": "60 days from publication on 2026-06-23 falls on Saturday 2026-08-22, which rolls to the next business day",
   "due_certainty": "firm",
   "cadence": "per-event",
   "status": "filed",
   "discoverability": "published",
   "why_it_matters": "Both required responses were filed. The City Attorney answered on 2026-08-17, a week before the deadline; the Mayor filed a 15 page consolidated findings and recommendations table dated 2026-08-24, the deadline itself. This row previously read missing, and that was wrong. Penal Code 933.05 also caps any 'requires further analysis' answer at six months from publication, so a deferral inside these responses cannot be open ended.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Civil Grand Jury 2025-2026 resource collection, the canonical venue where responses are appended beneath each report",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/resource--2026--civil-grand-jury-reports-2025-2026/",
     "result": "FOUND. Both responses are linked from this page.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:07Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Office of the City Attorney response, read in full",
     "url": "https://api.sf.gov/documents/62494/At_Scale_At_Risk_Report_Response_CAT_081726.pdf",
     "result": "Letter to the Presiding Judge dated 2026-08-17, citing Penal Code 933 and 933.05, answering Finding 4 and Recommendation 4.1. Entered the sf.gov catalogue 2026-08-25T11:03:43 local.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:08Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Mayor's consolidated response, read in full",
     "url": "https://api.sf.gov/documents/62502/At_Scale_At_Risk_Report_Responses_MYR_082426_kEG3pjC.pdf",
     "result": "15 page findings and recommendations response table dated 2026-08-24. Entered the sf.gov catalogue 2026-08-25T11:15:44 local.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:08Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Earlier sweep, retained because it is what produced the error",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/resource--2026--civil-grand-jury-reports-2025-2026/",
     "result": "On the morning of 2026-08-25 this page carried only the report and its press release. The two responses were added to the catalogue at 11:03 and 11:15 the same day, roughly an hour later.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-08-25T17:00:00Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [],
   "watch_terms": [
    "grand jury",
    "at scale",
    "consolidated response",
    "response - office"
   ],
   "requests": [],
   "request": {
    "targets": [
     {
      "agency": "Mayor's Office",
      "portal": "https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com"
     },
     {
      "agency": "City Attorney",
      "portal": "https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com"
     }
    ],
    "subject": "Immediate Disclosure Request: Civil Grand Jury response, At Scale At Risk",
    "note": "Civil Grand Jury responses are filed with the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, not published by the responding office, so a records request is the practical route to a copy. The court's own file is the authoritative venue and should be checked in parallel.",
    "draft": "IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST\n\n1. I request the written response to the 2025-2026 Civil Grand Jury report 'At Scale, At Risk: Upgrading Data and Oversight to Improve Homelessness Services', published June 23, 2026, required under California Penal Code sections 933(c) and 933.05 within 60 days, together with any transmittal correspondence to the Presiding Judge.\n\n2. If you hold no such record, I request, under California Government Code section 7922.600, that you identify where records of this type are maintained, including the technology systems and physical locations involved, and assist in identifying any responsive record under a different title. If your office is willing to provide a written statement of diligent search and failure to find the record, of the kind described in California Evidence Code section 1284, that would be welcome, though I recognise no statute compels one.\n\nThis is a request under the California Public Records Act and San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 67. Because it is marked as an Immediate Disclosure Request under Section 67.25(a), a response is due by the close of business on the next business day. If you claim an extension under Section 67.25(b), please state the specific basis in writing.\n\nPlease produce records on a rolling basis under Section 67.25(d) rather than withholding everything until the last item is ready."
   },
   "filed_on": "2026-08-24",
   "correction": {
    "date": "2026-08-25",
    "text": "This row read MISSING and said no response of any kind had been published. That was false. Both required responses existed: the City Attorney's dated 2026-08-17 and the Mayor's dated 2026-08-24, the deadline itself. The sweep behind the original claim ran on the morning of 2026-08-25 and was accurate at that moment; the documents entered the sf.gov catalogue at 11:03 and 11:15 that same morning. Because the evidence log recorded dates and not times, the row could not show that its own check predated the filing by about an hour. Every check on this site now carries a timestamp. This is the second false absence claim caught by adversarial review rather than by a reader, and it is the reason the ledger no longer advances its own clock without a fresh sweep behind it."
   },
   "no_near_miss_reason": "Not applicable now that the documents are located. The original claim listed no near misses, which should itself have been a warning that the search vocabulary was too narrow."
  },
  {
   "id": "cgj-at-scale-90day",
   "title": "Board of Supervisors response, 90 day (At Scale, At Risk)",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "The Board's response resolution to Findings 1 through 3 and Recommendations 1.1, 1.4, 2.1 and 3.1 of the same Civil Grand Jury report.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "Cal. Penal Code Sec. 933(c)",
    "ordinance": "SF Civil Grand Jury 2025-2026, At Scale, At Risk",
    "quote": "The governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court within 90 days.",
    "code_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&sectionNum=933"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Board of Supervisors"
   ],
   "due": "2026-09-21",
   "due_basis": "90 days from publication on 2026-06-23",
   "due_certainty": "firm",
   "cadence": "per-event",
   "status": "not_yet_due",
   "discoverability": "absent",
   "why_it_matters": "Included before it comes due so the ledger demonstrates it is a clock, not a grievance list.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Civil Grand Jury 2025-2026 resource collection",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/resource--2026--civil-grand-jury-reports-2025-2026/",
     "result": "not yet filed, not yet due",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:08Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [],
   "no_near_miss_reason": "Not yet due.",
   "watch_terms": [
    "grand jury.{0,40}respon",
    "respon.{0,40}grand jury",
    "at scale.{0,30}respon"
   ],
   "requests": []
  },
  {
   "id": "ch124-semiannual-report",
   "title": "Semiannual report on Covered Facilities Approved",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "A report to the Board describing every Covered Facility approved in the prior six months, with address, Neighborhood and its share of citywide beds, facility type, approval date, whether a Board waiver was required, the Neighborhoods considered but rejected, and the steps taken to find a site in a Neighborhood with no shelter.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Admin Code Sec. 124.4",
    "ordinance": "Ordinance 172-25 (Board File 250487)",
    "quote": "Within six months of the Operative Date, and every six months thereafter, the Director of Real Estate, in consultation with DPH and HSH, shall submit to the Board of Supervisors a report describing all Covered Facilities that have been Approved by the City in the prior six month period.",
    "ordinance_url": "https://sfbos.org/sites/default/files/o0172-25.pdf"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Director of Real Estate, Office of the City Administrator"
   ],
   "due": "2026-07-01",
   "due_basis": "Six months after the Operative Date of 2026-01-01",
   "due_certainty": "firm",
   "cadence": "semiannual",
   "status": "filed",
   "discoverability": "buried",
   "filed_on": "2026-07-23",
   "filed_window": "Received by the Clerk between 2026-07-16 and 2026-07-23 per the agenda's own heading",
   "why_it_matters": "This row is why the tracker scores findability separately from compliance. The report was filed. It is also effectively invisible: it has no page on sf.gov, no CMS document record, and nothing on the Real Estate Division or City Administrator sites. It appears only as Petitions and Communications item (9) inside the July 28 2026 Board agenda packet. It is titled June 2026 Shelter Equity Analysis Report, which collides with the name of the different deliverable owed under Sec. 124.2(a). It is a one page letter reporting that nothing happened.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Board of Supervisors agenda for 2026-07-28, Petitions and Communications, item (9), read directly",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/documents/61026/bag072826_agenda.pdf",
     "result": "FOUND. 'From the Office of the City Administrator (ADM), pursuant to Administrative Code, Section 124.4, submitting the June 2026 Shelter Equity Analysis Report. Copy: Each Supervisor.'",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:08Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Legistar file and packet attachment",
     "url": "https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=15713416&GUID=A7773291-2433-4D63-860D-DB659FD6FAEA",
     "result": "Board File 260866, report reproduced in full in the 2026-07-28 board packet",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:09Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "sf.gov CMS, checked for any standalone record of this report",
     "url": "https://api.sf.gov/api/v2/documents/?search=covered+facilities",
     "result": "no CMS document record exists for it",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:29Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Real Estate Division and City Administrator department pages",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/departments--city-administrator",
     "result": "not published on either",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:29Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [],
   "correction": {
    "date": "2026-08-25",
    "text": "An earlier draft of this project listed this report as missing. That was wrong. It was found by two independent adversarial checks and then confirmed by hand in the Board's own agenda. The error is left visible here on purpose: it is exactly the failure mode this site's method exists to prevent."
   },
   "watch_terms": [
    "covered facilit",
    "124.4",
    "real estate division report"
   ],
   "requests": []
  },
  {
   "id": "ocoh-needs-assessment",
   "title": "Our City Our Home triennial homelessness needs assessment",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "A written needs assessment covering homelessness and homeless populations, including available data on subpopulations by race, family composition, sexual orientation, age, gender and disability status, transmitted to HSH to inform its strategic planning.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Business and Tax Regulations Code Sec. 2810(e)(2)(B), implemented by SF Admin Code Sec. 5.41-2(d)",
    "ordinance": "Proposition C, November 2018",
    "quote": "By December 31, 2019, and every three years thereafter.",
    "code_url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_business/0-0-0-48451"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Our City Our Home Oversight Committee",
    "Controller"
   ],
   "due": "2025-12-31",
   "due_basis": "Three year cycle from the 2019 base year",
   "due_certainty": "firm",
   "cadence": "triennial",
   "status": "filed",
   "discoverability": "published",
   "filed_on": "2025-12-10",
   "why_it_matters": "A green row. The Committee met a three year deadline three weeks early, and the document states on its face that it fulfils the section.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Located the 2025 Homelessness Needs Assessment and read its statement of statutory purpose",
     "url": "https://media.api.sf.gov/documents/2025_Homelessness_Needs_Assessment.pdf",
     "result": "FOUND, dated 2025-12-10, states it fulfils BTRC 2810(e)(2)(B)",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:30Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [],
   "watch_terms": [
    "needs assessment",
    "our city our home"
   ],
   "requests": []
  },
  {
   "id": "ocoh-annual-recommendations",
   "title": "Our City Our Home annual appropriations recommendations",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "Annual recommendations on appropriations from the Our City Our Home Fund, consistent with the needs assessment, to the Board of Supervisors, the Health Commission and the Homelessness Oversight Commission.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Admin Code Sec. 5.41-2(a), incorporating BTRC Sec. 2810(e)(2)(B)",
    "ordinance": "Proposition C, November 2018; article rewritten by Ordinance 99-26",
    "quote": "Annual recommendations about appropriations from the Fund, consistent with the needs assessment.",
    "code_url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Our City Our Home Oversight Committee"
   ],
   "due": "2026-06-01",
   "due_basis": "The code fixes no calendar date, so the duty tracks the City budget cycle. Dated here to the filing actually made.",
   "due_certainty": "interpreted",
   "cadence": "annual",
   "status": "filed",
   "discoverability": "published",
   "filed_on": "2026-06-01",
   "why_it_matters": "Filed to exactly the statutory recipients. Noted as interpreted rather than firm because the code sets no date, and the ledger should say so rather than invent one.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Located the June 2026 recommendations memo and checked its addressees against the statute",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/departments--our-city-our-home-oversight-committee",
     "result": "FOUND, 2026-06-01 memo covering FY26-27 and FY27-28, to the Mayor and Board, copied to the Health Commission and the Homelessness Oversight Commission",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:30Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [],
   "watch_terms": [
    "our city our home",
    "appropriation recommendation"
   ],
   "requests": []
  },
  {
   "id": "homeward-bound-report",
   "title": "Homeward Bound annual report",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "Annual report on the Homeward Bound relocation and reunification program.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Admin Code Sec. 20.19-4",
    "ordinance": "Chapter 20, Article XIX",
    "quote": "Annual report due October 1.",
    "code_url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "HSH"
   ],
   "due": "2025-10-01",
   "due_basis": "October 1 under Sec. 20.19-4 as it read in 2025. Superseded: Ordinance 137-26 amended this section effective 2026-08-22 and the October 1 date appears to have been struck.",
   "due_certainty": "superseded",
   "cadence": "annual",
   "status": "filed",
   "discoverability": "published",
   "filed_on": "2025-10-02",
   "why_it_matters": "The FY2024-25 report was filed one day after the deadline that applied at the time, which is why this reads filed rather than missing. The row is retained mainly as a warning about method. Ordinance 137-26 amended Sec. 20.19-4 effective 2026-08-22, and the reporting duty, the responsible department and the recipients all appear to have changed. We caught this ordinance striking a different section, Admin Code 106.5(d), and missed that it reached this one too, in the same 362 page document. No future instance of this row should be scored until the enacted text is read.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "HSH Additional Reporting and Compliance collection",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/resource--2024--additional-reporting-and-compliance",
     "result": "FOUND, FY2024-25 report posted 2025-10-02",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:30Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Board of Supervisors agenda 2026-07-21, digest of Ordinance 250630 (later Ordinance 137-26)",
     "url": "https://media.api.sf.gov/documents/bag072126_agenda.pdf",
     "result": "Item 57 of the ordinance's own digest is 'the Homeward Bound Program', confirming this section was amended. We could not retrieve the enacted text: media.api.sf.gov returns 403 and the archive host 404 for o0137-26.pdf, so the new deadline, owner and recipients are unverified.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:30Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [],
   "watch_terms": [
    "homeward bound"
   ],
   "requests": []
  },
  {
   "id": "ch21b-quarterly-contracts",
   "title": "Chapter 21B quarterly Core Initiative contract reports",
   "topic": "drugs",
   "what": "A report every three months listing each Core Initiative contract or lease executed without competitive procurement, with counterparty, services, amount, duration and measurable outcomes.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Admin Code Sec. 21B.6(b)",
    "ordinance": "Added as Sec. 21B.3 by Ordinance 61-19; redesignated and amended as 21B.6 by Ordinance 10-25, the Fentanyl State of Emergency ordinance, effective 2025-03-15",
    "quote": "A Designated Department that enters into or amends a Contract or Lease for a Core Initiative shall submit a report every three months.",
    "code_url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin/0-0-0-71811"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "HSH",
    "DPH",
    "Public Works",
    "Police",
    "Sheriff",
    "DEM",
    "Human Services Agency",
    "MOHCD",
    "City Administrator",
    "DHR"
   ],
   "due": "2026-06-30",
   "due_basis": "Most recent completed fiscal quarter. The code fixes no anchor date and no calendar quarters, saying only every three months.",
   "due_certainty": "interpreted",
   "cadence": "quarterly",
   "status": "partial",
   "discoverability": "published",
   "filed_on": "2026-07-22",
   "why_it_matters": "HSH is plainly complying and has filed four reports. The Sheriff's Office files too: its Chapter 21B Quarterly Report for FY2025-26 reached the Board between 2026-07-23 and 2026-08-27 and appears only as an item in the 2026-09-01 agenda, with no record on sf.gov. The other eight Designated Departments named in Sec. 21B.2 have nothing published. That is not automatically a breach, because the duty only attaches to a department that actually executed a Core Initiative contract, and we cannot see which did. This row is marked partial rather than missing for exactly that reason.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "HSH Additional Reporting and Compliance collection, all four filings downloaded and confirmed as real PDFs",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/resource--2024--additional-reporting-and-compliance",
     "result": "FOUND four: 2025-07-31, 2025-10-31, 2026-01-28, and 2026-07-17 covering through 2026-06-30",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:30Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Searched the CMS for equivalent filings from the other nine Designated Departments",
     "url": "https://api.sf.gov/api/v2/documents/?search=core+initiative",
     "result": "none found from any department other than HSH",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:30Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Board of Supervisors agendas 2025-07 to 2026-09, searched for Chapter 21B filings from any department",
     "url": "https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/sites/default/files/bag011326_agenda.pdf",
     "result": "Other departments do file under Chapter 21B. The Sheriff's Office submitted waiver notifications on 2026-01-13, and an agenda of 2026-01-06 records 10 notifications from various departments. These are waiver notifications rather than the 21B.6(b) quarterly contract report, so they do not discharge this duty, but they do show the other departments are not silent under the chapter. A re-check on 2026-09-12 found the Sheriff's Office had gone further: its Chapter 21B Quarterly Report for FY2025-26 is listed in the 2026-09-01 agenda, recorded in the next entry.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:58:05Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Board of Supervisors agenda for 2026-09-01, Petitions and Communications, item (25), read directly",
     "url": "https://media.api.sf.gov/documents/bag090126_agenda.pdf",
     "result": "FOUND. 'From the Office of the Sheriff (SHF), pursuant to Administrative Code, Chapter 21B.3 and Ordinance No. 10-25, submitting Chapter 21B Quarterly Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026. Copy: Each Supervisor.' Received in the 2026-07-23 to 2026-08-27 window. It has no page on sf.gov and no catalogue record; the Board agenda is the only public trace of it.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:58:05Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [],
   "caveat": "HSH combines Q3 and Q4 into a single July filing in both fiscal years, so the cadence is closer to three filings a year than to every three months. An earlier version of this row said the other nine Designated Departments had filed nothing. That was too strong: they file waiver notifications under the same chapter, and a re-check on 2026-09-12 found the Sheriff's Office had filed the quarterly report itself, to the Board rather than to sf.gov. What is absent is the quarterly contract report from the other eight, which may not owe one.",
   "watch_terms": [
    "\\bch\\.? ?21b\\b",
    "chapter 21b",
    "core initiative"
   ],
   "requests": []
  },
  {
   "id": "ch21b-donations-report",
   "title": "Chapter 21B annual donations report",
   "topic": "drugs",
   "what": "An annual report to the Board on donations accepted and expended under the Core Initiatives donation authority, which allowed up to 10 million dollars in gifts, grants, services and bequests.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Admin Code Sec. 21B.4",
    "ordinance": "Ordinance 10-25 (Board File 250040), effective 2025-03-15",
    "quote": "The enacted sentence is truncated mid-clause. American Legal carries the codification note 'So in Ord. 10-25'.",
    "code_url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin/0-0-0-71811"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Designated Departments under Sec. 21B.2"
   ],
   "due": null,
   "due_basis": "None ascertainable. The enacted text does not complete the sentence that would set the deadline.",
   "due_certainty": "undeterminable",
   "cadence": "annual",
   "status": "undeterminable",
   "discoverability": "absent",
   "why_it_matters": "A duty whose deadline cannot be computed cannot be enforced or tracked, and saying so plainly is the finding. This row exists to show the ledger reports drafting defects rather than converting them into accusations. None of HSH's four Chapter 21B filings mention donations or gifts.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Read the enacted code text",
     "url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin/0-0-0-71811",
     "result": "sentence truncated mid-clause, publisher note 'So in Ord. 10-25'",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:31Z"
    },
    {
     "method": "Text extraction across all four HSH Chapter 21B filings",
     "url": "https://www.sf.gov/resource--2024--additional-reporting-and-compliance",
     "result": "no mention of donations or gifts in any of them",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:41Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [],
   "watch_terms": [
    "core initiative.{0,30}donation",
    "21b.{0,20}donation",
    "donation.{0,20}report.{0,20}21b"
   ],
   "requests": []
  },
  {
   "id": "nav-centers-semiannual",
   "title": "Navigation Centers semiannual Controller report",
   "topic": "homelessness",
   "what": "The Controller's semiannual report to the Board tracking Navigation Center outcomes: residents served, lengths of stay, exit destinations and benefits retention.",
   "law": {
    "citation": "SF Admin Code Sec. 106.5(d)",
    "ordinance": "Struck in its entirety by Ordinance 137-26 (Board File 250630), passed 7 to 4 on 2026-07-21 and approved 2026-07-23",
    "quote": "Within six months of the effective date, and every six months thereafter, until the Navigation Centers are no longer in operation.",
    "code_url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin"
   },
   "owed_by": [
    "Controller"
   ],
   "due": null,
   "due_basis": "Repealed. No further instance comes due.",
   "due_certainty": "repealed",
   "cadence": "semiannual",
   "status": "repealed",
   "discoverability": "published",
   "why_it_matters": "Carried on the ledger as a repeal, not a failure, and as a warning about method. The codified Administrative Code on American Legal, current as of today, still shows Sec. 106.5(d) intact months after it was struck. Any tracker that scraped the code would report this dead duty as live and accuse the Controller of missing a deadline that no longer exists. Repeals have to be tracked from ordinances.",
   "checked": [
    {
     "method": "Obtained the full 362 page final board-amended text of Ordinance 137-26 and verified the strikethrough by rendering the page rather than trusting text extraction",
     "url": "https://sfgov.legistar.com",
     "result": "Sec. 106.5(d) struck in its entirety, listed as item 38",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-08-25",
     "date_precision_only": true
    },
    {
     "method": "Cross-checked the codified version for staleness",
     "url": "https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_admin",
     "result": "2026 S-96 still shows 106.5(d) intact, confirming the code is behind the ordinance",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-08-25",
     "date_precision_only": true
    },
    {
     "method": "Cross-check of the item number cited for this repeal",
     "url": "https://media.api.sf.gov/documents/bag072126_agenda.pdf",
     "result": "The item number shifted between the agenda digest and the enacted text because other sections were inserted ahead of it. The repeal itself is not in doubt; the ordinal is, so it is no longer cited.",
     "http": 200,
     "at": "2026-09-12T17:55:42Z"
    }
   ],
   "considered_rejected": [],
   "watch_terms": [
    "navigation center"
   ],
   "requests": []
  }
 ],
 "enforcement_note": "Filing a request is not a remedy. The Supervisor of Records, who is the City Attorney, does not decide timeliness. The Sunshine Ordinance Task Force averaged 138 days to hear complaints in 2025 against a 45 day statutory limit, and its 2025 annual report records 54 orders issued, 6 confirmed refusals to comply, and zero orders with confirmed compliance. In SOTF Files 26035 and 26037, decided 2026-05-06, HSH was found to have violated sections 67.21(b), (c) and (e) over a request for shelter operating contracts, and HSH did not attend the hearing."
}